What You Say vs What You Do: Utilizing Positive Emotional Expressions to Relay AI Teammate Intent within Human-AI Teams
Rohit Mallick, Christopher Flathmann, Wen Duan, Beau G. Schelble, Nathan J. McNeese
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 192, 103355 (2024)
Abstract
With the expansive growth of AI's capabilities in recent years, researchers have been tasked with developing and improving human-centered AI collaborations, necessitating the creation of human-AI teams (HATs). However, the differences in communication styles between humans and AI often prevent human teammates from fully understanding the intent and needs of AI teammates. One core difference is that humans naturally leverage a positive emotional tone during communication to convey their confidence or lack thereof to convey doubt in their ability to complete a task. Yet, this communication strategy must be explicitly designed in order for an AI teammate to be human-centered. In this mixed-methods study, 45 participants completed a study examining how human teammates interpret the behaviors of their AI teammates when they express different positive emotions via specific words/phrases. Quantitative results show that, based on corresponding behaviors, AI teammates were able to use displays of emotion to increase trust in AI teammates and the positive mood of the human teammate. Additionally, our qualitative findings indicate that participants preferred their AI teammates to increase the intensity of their displayed emotions to help reduce the perceived risk of their AI teammate's behavior. When taken in sum, these findings describe the relevance of AI teammates expressing intensities of emotion while performing various behavioral decisions as a continued means to provide social support to the wider team and better task performance.
Read online
Open full screen ↗Read the paper
The full author-version PDF is free. It opens in your browser's PDF viewer.
BibTeX
@article{mallick2024what,
title = {What You Say vs What You Do: Utilizing Positive Emotional Expressions to Relay AI Teammate Intent within Human-AI Teams},
author = {Mallick, Rohit and Flathmann, Christopher and Duan, Wen and Schelble, Beau G. and McNeese, Nathan J.},
year = {2024},
journal = {International Journal of Human-Computer Studies},
note = {192, 103355},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103355}
}Topics
Related Work
A Mixed Methods Approach to Analyzing the Role of AI Teammates in Transition Phases
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Toward a Science of Human-AI Teaming for Decision-Making: A Complementarity Framework
PNAS Nexus
Bridging Human-AI Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction: Shared Challenges, Converging Futures
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (in press)
CATEMS: A Lifecycle Model of Compromised AI Teammate Attacks, Effects, and Mitigation Strategies for Enhanced Resilience
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting